Stumbleupon Gamed by Paid-to-Stumble Service

by Michael Martine on July 14, 2007 · 15 comments

stumbleupon-logo.pngMashable announces some unpleasant news. Unethical and unscrupulous website owners can pay to have their sites bookmarked on the popular StumbleUpon service. The controversial “service” behind this has already been paying Diggers to unnaturally promote links at Digg. Digg is already gamed from the inside, and it’s audience seems to be made up mostly of puerile adolescents, so I never cared much about it. But it would be very sad if you had to start wondering whether an article or site was stumbled because the user was paid. I have the feeling that it wouldn’t be too hard to spot these StumbleUpon users and ban their IP addresses: their stumble lists would be full of crap, and their profile information would be minimal. They would never join any StumbleUpon communities. There would be no avatar.

I hope StumbleUpon plans to fight this. There’s nothing wrong with doing it, legally, but because StumbleUpon is only worth the value of its links to its users, it would be in StumbleUpon’s best interest (that being the best interests of its users) to fight any attempts to game their system with cash.

If you want to get increased stumbles, here’s the right way to do it: Please Stumble this Post! Stumblers need to know about this! Thank you!

trafficrush250250 If you want to really get traffic to your blog from StumbleUpon, then I invite you to check out Traffic Rush. Traffic Rush is an educational program that teaches you how to become a valuable member of StumbleUpon and how to participate in StumbluUpon to provide maximum benefit to others, thereby driving traffic to your own blog.

There are two parts to the course, a free part and a paid part. I would suggest you go through the free part to see if you like it and if it helps you (it’s oriented to beginners). If you find it helpful, then I think you’ll find the paid part will be worth it. It’s been my experience that traffic from StumbleUpon can be huge and it’s relevant traffic. Traffic from StumbleUpon is likely to stick around and subscribe to your blog. There’s no need to try and game StumbleUpon. You can get tons of traffic fair and square with Traffic Rush.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

{ 6 trackbacks }

Blog News Watch » Blog Archive » Gaming the Stumble System? Say It Ain’t So
July 16, 2007 at 11:13 am
A Writer’s Words, An Editor’s Eye » Blog Archive » Blogging Ethics
July 26, 2007 at 10:01 am
Your Responsibility to Your StumbleUpon Friends : Blog Resources Online
November 8, 2007 at 12:46 pm
Blogs will Rule 2008 | Remarkablogger
January 5, 2008 at 7:58 pm
65 Must Read StumbleUpon Articles - Newest on the Net
August 5, 2008 at 1:29 pm
StumbleUpon Tutorials
December 21, 2008 at 1:09 am

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

1 SEO Ranter July 18, 2007 at 1:14 pm

Terrible! Everyone knows free stumbles are much better than paid stumbles, surely.

Reply

2 Chris July 24, 2007 at 11:00 am

What with this new idea of paid-for comment leaving as well, it’s hard to know what’s genuine anymore :-(

Reply

3 Michael Martine July 24, 2007 at 11:46 am

@SEO Ranter: I couldn’t agree more.

@Chris: It is harder, but still possible to tell the fakes apart from genuine comments, and then delete them accordingly. I have the feeling that paid comments won’t contribute anything of value to the discussion. As I mentioned in my post, I bet the paid stumblers will all have similar characteristics when you view their StumbleUpon profiles. Time will tell if I am correct or not.

Reply

4 Laura September 4, 2007 at 8:56 am

I’m fed up with the way sites are abused by spammers. Not just comment spam and getting linked to through Technorati, Diggs and StumbleUpon. Have you looked at MyBlogLog, BlogCatalog and such? You get endless people who want to be earmarked as your friend. They want other sites to link to them. It’s spoiled the whole purpose of MyBlogLog. It should just be MySplogLog now. What especially ticks me off are the ones who say what a great blog I have, how much they enjoyed reading it, etc. Yet I can see they never even bothered to click into my blog and read one word of it. Are they that obsessed/ desperate? If so, why the frick would I ever want to read or link to their trash pit of a site?

Reply

5 Laura September 4, 2007 at 9:01 am

I came to your site to read an article you wrote about not using Adsense. I can’t find it though. It’s not linked on the site that quotes you

Reply

6 Michael Martine September 4, 2007 at 9:07 am

Laura, that article isn’t linked to from the site, it’s on the site! The link in your comment goes to a guest post I wrote on homebizblogger.

Reply

7 Matt Ellsworth November 8, 2007 at 4:53 pm

Paid stumbles are awful. I wonder if they will do something about it. You would think it would be easier to find – just look for a sub section of users who all have stumbled the same pages at the same time…. and only those pages…

Reply

8 Ruth Lanham November 10, 2007 at 7:49 pm

Thanks for the heads up. I had no idea.

Reply

9 Albuquerque NM November 10, 2007 at 8:58 pm

What will they think of next? First paid commenting and now paid stumblers. – Ashley

Reply

Leave a Comment